| 1 |
On Tuesday 03 February 2004 07:43 am, tigger@g.o wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 02:38:07PM +0200, Dan Armak wrote: |
| 3 |
> 2. Guaranteed someone will "clean" an ebuild thinking its to old and |
| 4 |
> needs to be removed. This is a big issue. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> If its a seperate tree where only people who know the rules of the tree |
| 7 |
> work, its more likely to stay consistant and not have stuff removed that |
| 8 |
> shouldn't be. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
How about an additional set of rights for enterprise/stable ebuilds in the |
| 11 |
current tree? If committer xyz doesn't have rights to the ebuild then they |
| 12 |
can't delete it. Of course they can always make a new non enterprise/stable |
| 13 |
ebuilds for the regular tree. |
| 14 |
Then the issue comes up is what if the committer makes an unauthorized |
| 15 |
enterprise/stable ebuild? One solution would be to have portage check the |
| 16 |
rights on the ebuild. If it doesn't have the additional set of rights then |
| 17 |
it's not an enterprise ebuild and it won't install. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Brett |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives