1 |
2015-05-03 13:19 GMT+03:00 Maxim Koltsov <maksbotan@g.o>: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Well, I can see your point. But I don't see any reasonable alternative --- |
4 |
> this functionality can't be generalized by any name, except "c++14" --- |
5 |
> that's only thing in common. |
6 |
> |
7 |
|
8 |
Yes, exactly. |
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
> Moreover, this is (I hope) a _temporal_ solution, until there's a gcc with |
12 |
> needed level of support. |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
I have increasing concerns about that. The relevant bugreport ( |
16 |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60177 ) is more than a year |
17 |
old, and still no feedback on it from gcc guys. |
18 |
|
19 |
Moreover, this bug is hardly related to C++11/14 — it's pure 03. I could |
20 |
live with some kludges in C++11, but they became incompatible with some of |
21 |
C++14. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Georg Rudoy |