| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Kill zeroconf and use "dnssd", "upnp", "ssdp". Problem solved? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On 01/04/13 06:43 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 7 |
> Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 00:27:59 schrieb Chí-Thanh Christopher |
| 8 |
> Nguyễn: |
| 9 |
>>> I would like to suggest unifying use-flag usage, and use |
| 10 |
>>> "zeroconf" anywhere. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> Sounds good. Do you think the same should apply to |
| 13 |
>> non-mDNS/DNS-SD based zeroconf like UPnP/SSDP? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> No idea to be honest... :| opinions? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 18 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRWkbRAAoJEJJZfKWYZ3eUmOgP/iUW6ubUy79R/nw92i7HtvR7 |
| 21 |
g84nyfOwQ5dw2vr0WguJCxrgipzAEdk4NjVQlLk9lUeEOnz3nvvTdxQYVwL1DAup |
| 22 |
pF0qE6Vc1tBznmaYwdBL6kA10FbSq+lswxhn7xiK6rIj4HoJmN7m2FQ26QBEv5wq |
| 23 |
5TvTAaVdFa+RdxSttoq2WrP+pSOUzJA2PLRdRuIOgqBkrfHo1glEEY9wYyOw9eOr |
| 24 |
RNwFg0ifhjTwgve4tCR5Fmp5oaRipm1xvN8+ksctY8oB067uARGISYdtUz0siV3C |
| 25 |
j/O/GTkXY6BsVKR7x+TQ9H0S3Snt+BubYSk8u9Dnx+tKMwBH0HlEMwEdLUZuUlgs |
| 26 |
MjSB5k8105UBX2DZOSUBcEKELda5U1yMTQm4oVB2oJFpeSKDhRvF9g7nwATZL4FR |
| 27 |
XZvXAjLI7jtbVvhAWXQXSMSRoCEGZ+iCDGhjMoQKJf8uIrbPi8NuQ7d9vFxXKaMP |
| 28 |
ZbqFDR/8yG/E7yQR+GCg5VW3svPEfiDaRcMLE/XrUYtteEy+WaNd4VFio4abBfYY |
| 29 |
2G//Lr+vZCMbA/zN9nY/UGmwK/5D/dYfCfIg6jO5JGQQyf7bIWXI4z9dDXaq0CjO |
| 30 |
SoIo8gFylhVcx4bFC2lAze7dLsgovJynVv+Ke/3q+VCENPUphLNGPTBBFQGeEh1g |
| 31 |
PkV0piWKafSJJ+d43y4T |
| 32 |
=WtVK |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives