1 |
Greg KH wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 10:49:04PM +0100, twofourtysix wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>>On 05/09/05, Petteri R?ty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>>I have a couple of old machines I maintain and emerging and unmerging |
7 |
>>>kernel sources take a while because there are so many files. Also one |
8 |
>>>set of gentoo sources takes about 230MB of disk space. By removing stuff |
9 |
>>>not belonging to x86 I was able to succesfully run make with 58MB/230MB |
10 |
>>>removed. The stuff I removed: |
11 |
>>>arch/* except i386 and x86_64 |
12 |
>>>include/asm-* expect asm-generic, asm-i386 and asm-x86_64 |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>>Is this safe? |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> No it isn't. Please don't try to do this, it's not worth it. If disk |
18 |
> space is limited, just build on one box, and install the kernel to the |
19 |
> other one. |
20 |
IMHO it is, but not as a USE flag (it will never be stable enough |
21 |
without upstream support) but I think many would find the functionality |
22 |
useful in a script. I know I would. If it works most of the time and |
23 |
saves space, there is no reason not trim things. If it breaks, you |
24 |
immediately revert to a normal build. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Or, put the kernel source on a cd, and build off of it (putting the |
27 |
> objects on your local disk.) This lets you only use the local disk for |
28 |
> your built objects. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> thanks, |
31 |
> |
32 |
> greg k-h |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |