Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Peter Johanson <latexer@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Legal issues with Intersil firmware
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 15:46:09
Message-Id: 20040208154634.GA7658@gonzo.stern.nyu.edu
1 hey all,
2
3 i'm desperately trying to get a snapshot or two of the prism54 driver
4 into portage, but there's some legal... "hangups" with regards to the
5 firmware image. The problem is the terms of the firmware images'
6 redistrubtion is completely in the air. From
7 http://prism54.org/firmware/ :
8
9 <snip>
10 Firmware versions, Re-distribution license, Usage license, and "open
11 source" firmware
12
13 There are only a few firmware files out there. In this page we list a
14 collection of them by version number. We do not yet have a
15 re-distribution license for them by Intersil (or globalspanvirata or
16 Conexant) but since Intersil wrote the original GPL driver and then
17 supported the Open Source community in mantaining it, we figure it's
18 only fair we're allowed to redistribute them here. Our official
19 permission is pending. We do not have a "usage" license but should we
20 get one, I'm pretty sure it'll just say you can use the firmware in
21 whatever way you want except reverse-engineering.
22 </snip>
23
24 So... for now i'm adding a RESTRICT="nomirror" and adding it to portage,
25 and i've sent an email to prism54-devel asking for clarification. Do people
26 think we should force the user to download the firmware by hand, or is
27 the nomirror enough?
28
29 -pete
30
31 --
32 Peter Johanson
33 <latexer@g.o>
34
35 Key ID = 0x6EFA3917
36 Key fingerprint = A90A 2518 57B1 9D20 9B71 A2FF 8649 439B 6EFA 3917

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Legal issues with Intersil firmware Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Legal issues with Intersil firmware Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>