| 1 |
> > |
| 2 |
> > I wouldn't block anyone from doing this, but it's not something I'm |
| 3 |
> > personally interested in pursuing. I see very little value here. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> First, you're trying to justify replacing repoman on an entirely subjective |
| 6 |
> opinion of "I think <foo> is superior" ... |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Well, if you've ever tried it you'll notice that <foo> for <foo> != repoman |
| 9 |
actually finishes the checks within a finite amount of time. Kind of, the |
| 10 |
most blatant argument for ditching repoman, actually. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 15 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 16 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 17 |
(council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice) |
Archives