1 |
On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 21:54, Georgi Georgiev wrote: |
2 |
> maillog: 01/05/2004-23:10:27(+0200): Paul de Vrieze types |
3 |
> > On Saturday 01 May 2004 20:16, Georgi Georgiev wrote: |
4 |
> > > maillog: 01/05/2004-19:20:02(+0200): Sven Vermeulen types |
5 |
> > > |
6 |
> > > Isn't that asking too much from the user? |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > Maybe there can be a way to automate the process. It should be as simple as |
9 |
> > > asking the user to supply the full package name in an easily parsable |
10 |
> > > format. Looking up the maintainer is a machine's job, and a job that a |
11 |
> > > machine can do well. As for how to do it... a script parsing the mail of |
12 |
> > > bug-wranglers should suffice. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > This was the idea when the herds setup was originally thought out. |
15 |
> > Unfortunately that didn't happen as bugzilla needs to be extended for it. It |
16 |
> > shouldn't be difficult though. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Not really. Bugzilla can be used "as-is", if for example the user is asked to |
19 |
> write the name of the package as the first word of the summary field. A script |
20 |
> can parse the e-mail received by bug-wranglers and work with the first word |
21 |
> from the summary (foo/bar for example). |
22 |
|
23 |
Or if we significantly rework the purpose of "Component" within the |
24 |
Gentoo Linux "Product" to be package names. |
25 |
-- |
26 |
Donnie Berkholz |
27 |
Gentoo Linux |