| 1 |
maillog: 01/05/2004-23:10:27(+0200): Paul de Vrieze types |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 01 May 2004 20:16, Georgi Georgiev wrote: |
| 3 |
> > maillog: 01/05/2004-19:20:02(+0200): Sven Vermeulen types |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Isn't that asking too much from the user? |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > Maybe there can be a way to automate the process. It should be as simple as |
| 8 |
> > asking the user to supply the full package name in an easily parsable |
| 9 |
> > format. Looking up the maintainer is a machine's job, and a job that a |
| 10 |
> > machine can do well. As for how to do it... a script parsing the mail of |
| 11 |
> > bug-wranglers should suffice. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> This was the idea when the herds setup was originally thought out. |
| 14 |
> Unfortunately that didn't happen as bugzilla needs to be extended for it. It |
| 15 |
> shouldn't be difficult though. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Not really. Bugzilla can be used "as-is", if for example the user is asked to |
| 18 |
write the name of the package as the first word of the summary field. A script |
| 19 |
can parse the e-mail received by bug-wranglers and work with the first word |
| 20 |
from the summary (foo/bar for example). |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
( Georgi Georgiev ( Schapiro's Explanation: The grass is always ( |
| 24 |
) chutz@×××.net ) greener on the other side -- but that's ) |
| 25 |
( +81(90)6266-1163 ( because they use more manure. ( |
Archives