| 1 |
Olivier Crête wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On Sun, 2005-13-03 at 02:51 +0200, Alin Nastac wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>Olivier Crête wrote: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>>This package I happen to use at work, I could say I did more than a |
| 10 |
>>simple test. |
| 11 |
>>Do you suggest that, if this bug is real, I should know about? |
| 12 |
>>Do you understand that tests don't always detect bugs, right? |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>Ohh I was just commenting on another QA related thread... and I was |
| 17 |
>extrapolating that this might be related to a certain QA policy that |
| 18 |
>certain developers seem to follow... But it is sure that testing doesn't |
| 19 |
>find the interesting bugs (that's why we need users!)... |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
On second thought, I've made a mistake marking this package as stable. |
| 24 |
It is in its early development stage and I've should look on its |
| 25 |
changelog first. |
Archives