| 1 |
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev |
| 2 |
<tetromino@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 11:14 -0700, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Beside the fact that these would probably have looked better in |
| 5 |
>> /usr/libexec |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> See Kay Sievers's comment at |
| 8 |
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 : |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> "/usr/lib/<pkgname>/ is a directory like /usr/libexec/ or even /bin. It |
| 11 |
> shares absolutely zero things with the arch-specific $libdir ,or lib64/. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> /usr/lib/<pkgname>/ is the canonical "application private directory". It |
| 14 |
> has the multi-lib or arch-specific rules as /bin. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
So... where should GRUB2 be installing its modules? Currently they get |
| 18 |
installed in /usr/$(get_libdir)/grub/$cpu-$platform, where cpu and |
| 19 |
platform are determined by use flags. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Should we drop the get_libdir and put them in /usr/lib/grub instead? |
| 22 |
Should I even worry about it? |
Archives