1 |
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 17:56 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev |
3 |
> <tetromino@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 11:14 -0700, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
5 |
> >> Beside the fact that these would probably have looked better in |
6 |
> >> /usr/libexec |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > See Kay Sievers's comment at |
9 |
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 : |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > "/usr/lib/<pkgname>/ is a directory like /usr/libexec/ or even /bin. It |
12 |
> > shares absolutely zero things with the arch-specific $libdir ,or lib64/. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > /usr/lib/<pkgname>/ is the canonical "application private directory". It |
15 |
> > has the multi-lib or arch-specific rules as /bin. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> |
18 |
> So... where should GRUB2 be installing its modules? Currently they get |
19 |
> installed in /usr/$(get_libdir)/grub/$cpu-$platform, where cpu and |
20 |
> platform are determined by use flags. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Should we drop the get_libdir and put them in /usr/lib/grub instead? |
23 |
> Should I even worry about it? |
24 |
|
25 |
There really have no reason to be in $(get_libdir) as they're not |
26 |
compiled for the platform implied by $(get_libdir) ! |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Olivier Crête |
30 |
tester@g.o |
31 |
Gentoo Developer |