| 1 |
On 14.08.2012 03:24, Olivier Crête wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 17:56 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev |
| 4 |
>> <tetromino@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 11:14 -0700, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>> Beside the fact that these would probably have looked better in |
| 7 |
>>>> /usr/libexec |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> See Kay Sievers's comment at |
| 10 |
>>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 : |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> "/usr/lib/<pkgname>/ is a directory like /usr/libexec/ or even /bin. It |
| 13 |
>>> shares absolutely zero things with the arch-specific $libdir ,or lib64/. |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> /usr/lib/<pkgname>/ is the canonical "application private directory". It |
| 16 |
>>> has the multi-lib or arch-specific rules as /bin. |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> So... where should GRUB2 be installing its modules? Currently they get |
| 20 |
>> installed in /usr/$(get_libdir)/grub/$cpu-$platform, where cpu and |
| 21 |
>> platform are determined by use flags. |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> Should we drop the get_libdir and put them in /usr/lib/grub instead? |
| 24 |
>> Should I even worry about it? |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> There really have no reason to be in $(get_libdir) as they're not |
| 27 |
> compiled for the platform implied by $(get_libdir) ! |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
+1, that's correct. |
Archives