Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Patrick Lauer <gentoo@×××××××××××××.de>
To: Rainer Groesslinger <scandium@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Security Problems: xmule, lmule
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 23:26:03
Message-Id: 1061335558.14357.7.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Security Problems: xmule, lmule by Rainer Groesslinger
1 On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 01:08, Rainer Groesslinger wrote:
2 > On Wednesday 20 August 2003 00:47, Patrick Lauer wrote:
3 [snip]
4 > > Please discourage the use of lmule and xmule until fixed versions are
5 > > available.
6 >
7 > lmule was removed from the tree several weeks ago because it isn't
8 > developed anymore and unsupported for a few months now.
9 ok
10
11 > The problem - indeed - is, that even their latest unstable release
12 > (1.5.6a) doesn't fix the problem and I observe xmule sharply and am
13 > waiting for a fixed release or at least a patch.
14 I recommend masking _all_ versions at the moment and issuing a GLSA.
15 Maybe I'm overreacting, but I do not wish to have my computer rooted :)
16
17 > I added an einfo about the security hole in all the xmule ebuilds and I
18 > hope they release 1.4.4 or something soon (which will immediatly be
19 > arch of course)
20 That's good, but I don't think it's adequate since not everybody
21 reinstalls xmule every day _and_ reads all einfo lines scrolling by.
22
23 Btw, what's the official way for reporting vulnerabilities?
24 On the website I found almost nothing ... maybe this could be made
25 easier? Or did I miss something really obvious?
26
27 Thanks for the almost instantaneous response,
28
29 Patrick Lauer
30
31
32 --
33 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Security Problems: xmule, lmule Rainer Groesslinger <scandium@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Security Problems: xmule, lmule Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>