| 1 |
On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 14:58 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 2 |
> Steve Long kirjoitti: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > That makes a lot of sense. How about exending it a tiny bit and asking for |
| 5 |
> > it to be policy for all ebuilds EAPI=1 not to be allowed into stable |
| 6 |
> > without RESTRICT=test, or a functional test suite on the arch in question? |
| 7 |
> > The last bit would be automagically checked by the arch team, if the ebuild |
| 8 |
> > has no RESTRICT=test, during normal stabilisation (I'd hope?) since the |
| 9 |
> > build would fail. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> And this is different from the current policy in what way? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Hmm, i don't want to offend anyone, i don't even want to say that it was |
| 15 |
wrong to push these to stable regarding the current situation, but what, |
| 16 |
for example, about these? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
bug 165085 |
| 19 |
bug 133002 |
| 20 |
bug 156572 |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives