Archives
Archives
| From: | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April) | ||
| Date: | Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:04:18 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4620C1EA.9010405@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April) by Steve Long |
||
| 1 | Steve Long kirjoitti: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > That makes a lot of sense. How about exending it a tiny bit and asking for |
| 4 | > it to be policy for all ebuilds EAPI=1 not to be allowed into stable |
| 5 | > without RESTRICT=test, or a functional test suite on the arch in question? |
| 6 | > The last bit would be automagically checked by the arch team, if the ebuild |
| 7 | > has no RESTRICT=test, during normal stabilisation (I'd hope?) since the |
| 8 | > build would fail. |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | |
| 11 | And this is different from the current policy in what way? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Regards, |
| 14 | Petteri |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April) | Matthias Langer <mlangc@×××.at> |