Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Geaaru <geaaru@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: gentoo-dev-announce@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: app-office/hamster-time-tracker
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 08:20:53
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] last rites: app-office/hamster-time-tracker by Nicolas Bock
I'm not sure that is correct to reply to this thread, sorry if not.

I currently use hamster and yes master tree is unmaintained but scenario is
difficult for this package. From old tree are been created different fork:
* one that split module in different modules (hamster-lib, hamster-gtk,
* one that rebuild module on ruby
* if I remember correctly one that continue python implementation

But, it isn't so clear at least for me, what is the best fork or stable (I
currently use old implememtation).
So, I think that could be a choice try to identify a more stable fork and
move ebuild to this new implementation (maybe with a rename of the package)
and move ebuild to proxy-maintainer group.

I will try to investigate on it in the christmas holidays and see if I can
take care of ebuild maintenance.

My cent


On Dec 6, 2017 11:42 PM, "Nicolas Bock" <nicolasbock@g.o> wrote:

> # Nicolas Bock <nicolasbock@g.o> (6 Dec 2017) > # Development has ceased, the last commit to the upstream repository was > # on 16 July 2016 with a note stating that its status is unmaintained [1]. > # See also Bug 640034. > # > # [1] > 8fdecfd1566cac8b6836228a27cce > > -- > Nicolas Bock <nicolasbock@g.o> >