| 1 |
On 21/07/14 23:56, Micha³ Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> Now... whether dynamic deps are technically the right thing to do is another |
| 3 |
> question. It merits discussion, but we need to be really sure about the |
| 4 |
> consequences of any change. |
| 5 |
> Yes, it does. I'm not sure if it leads anywhere, though. Dynamic deps |
| 6 |
> are a pipe dream. You can't implement them properly, so we're using |
| 7 |
> half-working implementation as an excuse to be lazy. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
What's lazy is maintainer doing revision bump without thinking |
| 10 |
if it's really required, spreading his laziness upon every users |
| 11 |
machine (by triggering revision bump driven rebuild) |
Archives