Archives
Archives
| From: | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status | ||
| Date: | Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:14:24 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4786978D.50805@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status by "William L. Thomson Jr." |
||
| 1 | William L. Thomson Jr. kirjoitti: |
| 2 | > gcj is not even official maintained by any Gentoo Devs atm. No where |
| 3 | > near close to being added to tree. Much less in the same overlay as |
| 4 | > openjdk. Not that it's in bad shape, but there is no syncing or |
| 5 | > collaboration there. But seems moot, as IcedTea should not require gcj |
| 6 | > to build. If I am reading the upstream docs correctly[3]. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | |
| 9 | IcedTea builds with any 1.5 JDK. So that includes both gcj and sun-jdk. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Regards, |
| 12 | Petteri |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |