| 1 |
Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> said: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 17:38:48 -0400 |
| 3 |
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > i dont see how anyone can be against this (unless you're a |
| 5 |
> > terrorist!), so this is on track to be integrated as-is into the dev |
| 6 |
> > handbook Etiquette section |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> The last two paragraphs aren't really acceptable for a code of conduct |
| 9 |
> from my POV. And I'm referring to the general meaning there, not the |
| 10 |
> specific wording. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I completely agree. I was happy with the document until the last two |
| 13 |
paragraphs. It became less a "Code of Conduct" and more of a developer |
| 14 |
relations/devrel/whatever policy. Lets keep that out of a document like |
| 15 |
this and decide on that through the appropriate channels. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If those last two paragraphs are cut, I'm quite happy with it, even if |
| 18 |
it isn't all true right now, and is something we should strive towards |
| 19 |
doing. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting qa toolchain x86) |
| 23 |
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org |
| 24 |
mark AT halcy0n DOT com |
| 25 |
web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/ |
| 26 |
http://www.halcy0n.com |
Archives