| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 5 |
| Um, sort of? The council exists mainly to make cross-project decisions. |
| 6 |
| I suppose that this issue counts, since it involves both the baselayout |
| 7 |
| folks and the GDP, but the GDP doesn't really care which logger is |
| 8 |
| installed by virtual/logger, as long as they know when it changes. As |
| 9 |
| such, I would say that it's up to the package maintainers (base-system) |
| 10 |
| to make that decision. Oh, I suppose that if base-system were to choose |
| 11 |
| poorly, and large numbers of devs were upset, then the council would get |
| 12 |
| involved, but this issue just doesn't seem that contentious. I've heard |
| 13 |
| lots of people state that they would rather have logger "foo" as the |
| 14 |
| default, but those same people will just shrug and install their |
| 15 |
| favorite if foo isn't chosen. It's just not that big a deal. |
| 16 |
| If the council chooses to address this issue I'm hardly going to |
| 17 |
| complain, but I don't really think that it's worth their time. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Somebody already pointed this out, but baselayout has nothing to do with |
| 20 |
the profiles, where virtual/logger is specified. That's the base system |
| 21 |
project, and in particular the arch teams. Although it's not clear who |
| 22 |
controls the top-level profiles, since it could be either releng or base |
| 23 |
the way I see it. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Thanks, |
| 26 |
Donnie |
| 27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iD8DBQFDTUr1XVaO67S1rtsRAgnvAJ9hCzay9NmGdojgzaW9cQNGcqXDhQCeP+Lk |
| 31 |
0I79vRe3r6wamAd47rDdAHI= |
| 32 |
=Kjlq |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives