1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: [Tue Oct 11 2005, 04:10:28PM CDT] |
2 |
> I think the point is that they should match. It was also quite obvious |
3 |
> after the comments on the thread, that this is one of those things that |
4 |
> probably won't ever be solved by consensus. Is this not the exact thing |
5 |
> that the Council is there to do, to make decisions that we cannot agree |
6 |
> on ourselves? |
7 |
|
8 |
Um, sort of? The council exists mainly to make cross-project decisions. |
9 |
I suppose that this issue counts, since it involves both the baselayout |
10 |
folks and the GDP, but the GDP doesn't really care which logger is |
11 |
installed by virtual/logger, as long as they know when it changes. As |
12 |
such, I would say that it's up to the package maintainers (base-system) |
13 |
to make that decision. Oh, I suppose that if base-system were to choose |
14 |
poorly, and large numbers of devs were upset, then the council would get |
15 |
involved, but this issue just doesn't seem that contentious. I've heard |
16 |
lots of people state that they would rather have logger "foo" as the |
17 |
default, but those same people will just shrug and install their |
18 |
favorite if foo isn't chosen. It's just not that big a deal. |
19 |
If the council chooses to address this issue I'm hardly going to |
20 |
complain, but I don't really think that it's worth their time. |
21 |
|
22 |
-g2boojum- |
23 |
-- |
24 |
Grant Goodyear |
25 |
Gentoo Developer |
26 |
g2boojum@g.o |
27 |
http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum |
28 |
GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 |