| 1 |
On 01/14/15 10:16, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 12:58:21 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Any specific comments? I can handle x86 but I'd appreciate specific |
| 6 |
>> arch teams replying about more exotic arches. |
| 7 |
> +1 |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> i like the idea, but with a list of useflags that would get converted |
| 10 |
> this could "reach" more people i think |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
This sounds good to me too. Expansions to the base instruction set |
| 13 |
architecture is something more pertinent to the intel family going back |
| 14 |
to the pentium II days with mmx afaik and multiplying like rabbits every |
| 15 |
since. There is neon for arm and I don't know of any for mips or ppc. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Would this approach clean up some of the masking? Eg. I hate having to |
| 18 |
mask sse and friends in base/use.mask and then unmask them in |
| 19 |
arch/amd64/use.mask. I'm not sure if there's a technique to make a use |
| 20 |
expand flags relevant only for a particular profile. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. |
| 24 |
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] |
| 25 |
E-Mail : blueness@g.o |
| 26 |
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA |
| 27 |
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA |
Archives