Archives
Archives
| From: | Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | James Harlow <james@××××××××××××××.nu> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-security] GLEP #14: security updates based on GLSA | ||
| Date: | Fri, 22 Aug 2003 19:02:25 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1061579054.415.206.camel@vertigo | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-security] GLEP #14: security updates based on GLSA by James Harlow |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 14:45, James Harlow wrote: |
| 2 | > And lastly and cosmetically, dates are normally represented as a |
| 3 | > day/month/year structure. In the version element, I think that you |
| 4 | |
| 5 | YYYYMMDD is the ISO standard for dates, and I think all dates in Gentoo |
| 6 | should be using this widely accepted standard. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | Chris Gianelloni |
| 10 | Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-security] GLEP #14: security updates based on GLSA | Denys Duchier <duchier@×××××××××.de> |