| 1 |
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 02:39:02PM +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: |
| 2 |
> On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> > One more thing: might be a good idea to consider splitting some |
| 4 |
> > of the 'big' trackers (like CFLAGS) between Gentoo and GURU. I think |
| 5 |
> > solving these bugs in GURU has lower priority than in Gentoo. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I think that trackers like CFLAGS/LDFLAGS are here to track how many packages |
| 8 |
> have the problem. I don't see it like (for example) the gcc-porting tracker |
| 9 |
> that gives the idea about how much packages need a fix and how much packages |
| 10 |
> need to be last-rited |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
If want to track, can't we just have separate tracker(s) for GURU? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Now when look at this tracker can't tell how much is ::gentoo or |
| 15 |
::guru without doing some extra work. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
And, even if you don't see it like that, someday someone may want |
| 18 |
to go on a fixing spree using those trackers (may it be for ::guru |
| 19 |
or ::gentoo) but will keep seeing them mixed up together. |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
ionen |
Archives