| 1 |
Roy Marples wrote: |
| 2 |
> No it's not. bash does not recommend anything of the sort. It just |
| 3 |
> states what files are optionally used during initialisation. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> What I'm driving at is that you're making claims that things are broken |
| 6 |
> or recommended when in fact they are not. Try reading some RFC's and |
| 7 |
> then you'll have a clearer (hopefully!!) understanding of the words MUST |
| 8 |
> and SHOULD. Also you'll understand that if those words are not present |
| 9 |
> then it's entirely optional. I fully recommend reading RFC 2131 [1] as |
| 10 |
> I'm very well acquainted with it and it also provides lots of good |
| 11 |
> examples of these words :) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Thanks |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Roy |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> [1] http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=2131 |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> PS - This does not necessarily mean I think /etc/skel files in /root is |
| 20 |
> a bad thing, I just think you're going completely the wrong way about |
| 21 |
> getting this done. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
Roy, thanks for the advice. Obviously I misstated some things. |
| 25 |
However, man pages and info docs are written in more colloquial language |
| 26 |
than formal specifications. Anyway, I promise not to beat the dead horse. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
- John |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives