Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Collins Richey <crichey@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] glibc question re bug #67166 et al
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 20:41:22
Message-Id: e00942e4041017134162d14f16@mail.gmail.com
1 I've encountered one of the many flavors of this bug (arts-1.3.1 fails
2 to compile). The recommended action in the bugzilla is to recompile
3 glibc with USE="nptlonly." Is this a safe practice for nptl users, or
4 will this break something else because the linuxthreads code is
5 omitted?
6 --
7 /\/\
8 (CR) Collins Richey
9 \/\/ "I hear you're single again." "Spouse 2.0 had fewer bugs than
10 Spouse 1.0, but the maintenance ... was too much for my OS."
11 - Glitch (tm)
12
13 --
14 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc question re bug #67166 et al Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@×××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc question re bug #67166 et al Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>