| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 10:13, Guy Martin wrote: |
| 5 |
> That's how I see it for most packages. The script I coded |
| 6 |
> (http://dev.gentoo.org/~gmsoft/tools/imlate) checks stable version of |
| 7 |
> a packages on a given arch against the stable version on another arch |
| 8 |
> (x86 per default). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
But isn't exactly this an issue? You don't know which arch the package |
| 11 |
maintainer is using and checking against a single arch doesn't work, because |
| 12 |
a maintainer could mark it stable on his arch for some reason before the |
| 13 |
package maintainer had done this? So the first arch maintainer goes ahead, |
| 14 |
the next one thinks "oh, seems like the package maintainer marked it stable", |
| 15 |
gets bitten and the package maintainer has to resolve resulting problems |
| 16 |
(possibly including blame by users)? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Carsten |
| 20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 21 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
iD8DBQFA2BrzVwbzmvGLSW8RAvFiAJ44w72HeQFWG9mYhD43CmIgVKQ8lQCfTEYQ |
| 24 |
NdURnBi64GtJXTyd8DcPN/I= |
| 25 |
=xAB5 |
| 26 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives