| 1 |
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:27 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. <wlt-ml@××××××.com> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Not sure why anyone would have objection to such a warning like exists |
| 7 |
> for other things. Or providing more information to the user as to why a |
| 8 |
> package was not removed, or should not be removed. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> -- |
| 11 |
> William L. Thomson Jr. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
If you want dependencies checked, use the correct option which checks |
| 14 |
them. This takes significantly longer than -C, as it's significantly more |
| 15 |
complex to check for. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
As far as I can tell, you are literally asking for -C to behave like -c, |
| 18 |
when you could just be using -c instead. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-Ben |
Archives