Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 20:47:42
Message-Id: assp.03644a3221.20170710164732.1b6f9675@o-sinc.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds by Ben Kohler
1 On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 15:36:11 -0500
2 Ben Kohler <bkohler@×××××.com> wrote:
3 >
4 > If you want dependencies checked, use the correct option which checks
5 > them. This takes significantly longer than -C, as it's significantly
6 > more complex to check for.
7 >
8 > As far as I can tell, you are literally asking for -C to behave like
9 > -c, when you could just be using -c instead.
10
11 No I simply want warnings like that exist for profiles and set packages.
12
13 Also more information when attempting to remove a package that is not
14 removed.
15
16 --
17 William L. Thomson Jr.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o>