| 1 |
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:47 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. |
| 2 |
<wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 15:36:11 -0500 |
| 4 |
> Ben Kohler <bkohler@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> If you want dependencies checked, use the correct option which checks |
| 7 |
>> them. This takes significantly longer than -C, as it's significantly |
| 8 |
>> more complex to check for. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> As far as I can tell, you are literally asking for -C to behave like |
| 11 |
>> -c, when you could just be using -c instead. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> No I simply want warnings like that exist for profiles and set packages. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Also more information when attempting to remove a package that is not |
| 16 |
> removed. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Well, as was pointed out, doing that comes at a performance cost. |
| 19 |
Would it not make sense to have an option to skip dependency checks |
| 20 |
for use in scripts/etc where you know it is safe to do so? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Rich |
Archives