1 |
On 10/07/17 04:47 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 15:36:11 -0500 |
3 |
> Ben Kohler <bkohler@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> If you want dependencies checked, use the correct option which checks |
6 |
>> them. This takes significantly longer than -C, as it's significantly |
7 |
>> more complex to check for. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> As far as I can tell, you are literally asking for -C to behave like |
10 |
>> -c, when you could just be using -c instead. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> No I simply want warnings like that exist for profiles and set packages. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Also more information when attempting to remove a package that is not |
15 |
> removed. |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
OK, well, as Ben said it's not feasible to make -C act like -c due to |
19 |
the performance hit involved and due to the purpose of the command itself. |
20 |
|
21 |
It likely is feasible and may well make sense to add a message to the |
22 |
-c output that states that packages in the provided list aren't |
23 |
removed because they are dependencies. You should open up a bug for |
24 |
that against portage and let the portage dev's sort it out. |