| 1 |
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 17:21:42 -0400 |
| 2 |
Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On 10/07/17 04:47 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 15:36:11 -0500 |
| 5 |
> > Ben Kohler <bkohler@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> |
| 7 |
> >> If you want dependencies checked, use the correct option which |
| 8 |
> >> checks them. This takes significantly longer than -C, as it's |
| 9 |
> >> significantly more complex to check for. |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> As far as I can tell, you are literally asking for -C to behave |
| 12 |
> >> like -c, when you could just be using -c instead. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > No I simply want warnings like that exist for profiles and set |
| 15 |
> > packages. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > Also more information when attempting to remove a package that is |
| 18 |
> > not removed. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> OK, well, as Ben said it's not feasible to make -C act like -c due to |
| 22 |
> the performance hit involved and due to the purpose of the command |
| 23 |
> itself. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Have you profiled this? It shouldn't be slow if implemented correctly. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives