| 1 |
On Thursday 18 August 2005 01:28 pm, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 18 August 2005 19:19, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > ok, but then you still have the fact that you're writting an eclass for a |
| 4 |
> > single function ... isnt that the point of eutils ? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> A part eutils being polluted, when pmake is used directly with bsd-style MK |
| 7 |
> definitions, bsdmk take care of most of it. |
| 8 |
> That's why an eclass. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
then why not think bigger ... call it 'bsdeutils' or something rather than |
| 11 |
limiting yourself to bsd make |
| 12 |
-mike |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives