Archives
Archives
| From: | Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in games-strategy/openxcom: openxcom-1.0.0.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog | ||
| Date: | Sat, 14 Jun 2014 21:46:40 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20140614234629.52072a77@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in games-strategy/openxcom: openxcom-1.0.0.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog by "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 03:50:06 +0700 |
| 2 | "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" <mva@×××.name> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > You're right in all remarks, but Maxim is just proxy here. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | And that's where the whole proxy maintainership falls down, isn't it? |
| 7 | The committer should check for and take responsibility for any QA |
| 8 | issues that may arise. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | jer |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in games-strategy/openxcom: openxcom-1.0.0.ebuild metadata.xml Manifest ChangeLog | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> |