Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Peter Gordon <codergeek42@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] cdrtools license issues
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 01:16:52
Message-Id: 44F8DACF.7090806@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] cdrtools license issues by Carsten Lohrke
1 Carsten Lohrke wrote:
2 > Imho we have to remove the partly and incompatible relicensed cdrtools-2.01.01
3 > alpha ebuilds from the tree.
4
5 I completely agree. In fact, Fedora Development also had to revert this change
6 due to the same licensing issues a couple of weeks ago. (See the thread spawned
7 from the 20060817 rawhide report [1].)
8
9 There are also the dvdrtools [2] fork of it as well as libburn [3] (which, as I
10 understand it, has a bunch of wrapper scripts to be able to interpret and
11 implement various of its functionality, thus (mostly) suitable a drop-in
12 replacement for cdrtools.
13
14 [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-August/msg00644.html
15 [2] http://www.arklinux.org/projects/dvdrtools
16 [3] http://icculus.org/burn/
17 --
18 Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
19 Gentoo Forums Global Moderator
20 GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
21 DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
22 My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] cdrtools license issues Greg KH <gregkh@g.o>