| 1 |
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:21:34AM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> > |
| 3 |
> > First of all, I'm in limbo on this. Certainly not dead set against it. If |
| 4 |
> > this were to be used, I'd like to add the following line: "At least 1 of |
| 5 |
> > these three must be actively involved in the development of the package |
| 6 |
> > manager". |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Please don't change your wording on that. The feel really strongly |
| 9 |
> about the primary pkg manager of Gentoo needing remain under the full |
| 10 |
> control of Gentoo Linux. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Agreed, I'm of the opinion it would be inappropriate to let an outside |
| 14 |
entity steer our primary package manager. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 18 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives