Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:43:06
Message-Id: pan.2007.03.13.14.38.21@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo by Michael Cummings
1 Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o> posted
2 20070313073039.20a5556d@×××××××××××.mil, excerpted below, on Tue, 13 Mar
3 2007 07:30:39 -0400:
4
5 > My other item (you knew there'd be at least one more :) is something I
6 > brought up on irc yesterday, namely (if its feasible with infra)
7 > downgrading a subscription to read-only mode rather than outright
8 > banning/suspending a user from a mailing list. They would retain the
9 > right to receive the mail, just not comment for a short period (and
10 > hopefully cooler heads will prevail, yada, etc.).
11
12 As an alternative if read-only mode is too much trouble for infra (and
13 having not yet read the proposal), the list is carried by gmane.org, and
14 can be viewed there as as a newsgroup or via HTTP by anyone, subscribed
15 or not. Thus, read-only mail mode shouldn't be required, and it would be
16 impossible (without canceling gmane's access, but that's an important
17 community resource as an archive often linked to when referring to old
18 threads) to ban access entirely in any case.
19
20 Perhaps if infra doesn't want to hassle read-only mode and prefers a full
21 mail ban, mention could be made of gmane for those who wish to continue
22 read-only access.
23
24 --
25 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
26 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
27 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
28
29 --
30 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies