| 1 |
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Markus Meier <maekke@g.o> posted |
| 4 |
> 20080213213836.18f659ef@g.o, excerpted below, on Wed, 13 Feb 2008 |
| 5 |
> 21:38:36 +0100: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > djvu: Enable support for DjVu (a digital document format with advanced |
| 8 |
> > compression technology and high performance value) |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I'm not complaining if this is deemed acceptable, but I thought the idea |
| 11 |
> was to keep it to 80 chars, if possible. If that's the case, perhaps |
| 12 |
> leaving it at (a digital document format) might be preferable. That |
| 13 |
> still says at least what it is, so is workable IMO, even if the longer |
| 14 |
> description is certainly nicer if the 80 char limit no longer applies. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
What about: |
| 18 |
djvu: support DjVu, a PDF-like document format esp. suited for scanned |
| 19 |
documents |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 23 |
Researcher |
| 24 |
Mail: paul.devrieze@×××××.com |
| 25 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives