From: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Cc: | patrick@g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots | ||
Date: | Thu, 26 Sep 2013 07:53:09 | ||
Message-Id: | 20130926095322.3323b054@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots by Patrick Lauer |
1 | Dnia 2013-09-26, o godz. 15:15:38 |
2 | Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 | |
4 | > Thus I suggest declaring a policy: |
5 | > |
6 | > "" |
7 | > Any library bump that would trigger revdep-rebuild should be done with |
8 | > the affected library package.mask'ed until all its consumers have been |
9 | > properly bumped to subslot-aware versions. |
10 | > "" |
11 | > |
12 | > (The unmasking of the library then triggers a "migration" to happy |
13 | > portage updates that don't need human supervision) |
14 | |
15 | How do we handle packages which install multiple libraries? I'm afraid |
16 | forcing such a policy and/or hurrying developers to adapt will only |
17 | cause more of poppler-like issues to occur. |
18 | |
19 | -- |
20 | Best regards, |
21 | Michał Górny |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |
[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots | Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> |