| 1 |
On Tue, 01 May 2007 14:52:30 -0700 |
| 2 |
Josh Saddler <nightmorph@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> anyway, on the subject of tests...as others have covered the *first* |
| 4 |
> time this was discussed on the lists, mandatory tests being run every |
| 5 |
> time the user installs a package? no. oh hell no. we don't seem to do |
| 6 |
> that much with the packages in our tree now, do we? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
The first time this was discussed didn't come up with an ideal |
| 9 |
solution, and the existing situation is severely broken. Hence why this |
| 10 |
thread is going back to first principles -- once we've established what |
| 11 |
the problem really is, *then* we can start discussing solutions again. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
If you don't have anything constructive to say about the former, please |
| 14 |
keep quiet about the latter. That *you* cannot see an adequate |
| 15 |
solution does not mean that others won't after proper discussion. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives