Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/
Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 16:59:15
Message-Id: 57375956.7060206@iee.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/ by "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn"
1 On 14/05/16 17:53, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
2 > Gordon Pettey schrieb:
3 >
4 >> So, it's perfectly okay to make direct commits of obviously broken
5 >> code that
6 >> has no chance of working, because community something mumble...
7 >
8 > You may have missed some sarcasm in the post which you replied to.
9 > Plus, I don't think anybody said or implied that committing broken
10 > things is ok.
11 >
12 >
13 > Best regards,
14 > Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
15 >
16 I think the time is coming, given the diversity of members of this list,
17 to add <sarcasm></sarcasm> tags when we are not describing something
18 literally. It becomes very difficult to follow the thread of
19 conversation when people are (not) communicating their true thoughts!!

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies