Archives
Archives
| From: | Chris White <chriswhite@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] imlate x86 Editon and more x86 fun | ||
| Date: | Fri, 12 Aug 2005 05:25:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20050812135302.198eed72@localhost | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] imlate x86 Editon and more x86 fun by "Olivier Crête" |
||
| 1 | On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 23:15:17 -0400 |
| 2 | Olivier Cr(D+4te <tester@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | > We really need to form an x86 team... |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > -- |
| 8 | > Olivier Cr(D+4te |
| 9 | > tester@g.o |
| 10 | > x86 Security Liaison |
| 11 | |
| 12 | I really do agree with not only this, but the need for stable marking as well. Gentoo is very bleeding edge at this point, and I feel that stable packages are somewhat lacking. However, the problems I see is what is considered "Let the herd handle it" and what is considered "sure why not". The script output should help, I'm just afraid that if a person marks a package that the maintainer was planning on working at, things could go wrong. I'm open to ideas on such a team, but I'm not sure how to workout the major issues at this point. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Chris White |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] imlate x86 Editon and more x86 fun | Olivier Crete <tester@g.o> |