1 |
Alexis Ballier wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Hi, |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> What are we going to do with the global tetex USE flag? |
6 |
>> app-text/tetex is deprecated in favour of TeXLive which is still hard |
7 |
>> masked but will be the default TeX distribution in the future. |
8 |
>> Rename it to tex as TeXLive is based on teTeX? And what about |
9 |
>> USE=latex? Use a generic tex for it, too? |
10 |
> |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I had been thinking about it and am not sure what would be the best |
13 |
> option: |
14 |
> Some packages use the tetex useflag to enable some latex support, in |
15 |
> which case a latex useflag should be fine. (e.g. doxygen is the first |
16 |
> one I found that seems to be in that case) |
17 |
> Some others use it to enable kpathsea support, where tetex is the |
18 |
> historical distribution that provides it for us. From quickly digging |
19 |
> into lcdf-typetools code for ex., it seems it is used there to locate |
20 |
> files and update the kpathsea files so that other apps using kpathsea |
21 |
> will see the changes it has made. That way it integrates with a |
22 |
> tetex-alike distribution. So, imho, in that case a kpathsea useflag |
23 |
> would make more sense; but I doubt such a useflag name will speak by |
24 |
> itself. |
25 |
> |
26 |
The flag sounds ideal to me; there are plenty of other flags which just |
27 |
say "Use lib N to do X" and for people who know the area, the lib is known, |
28 |
and for newbs they normally should know about it. (Half the educational |
29 |
value in gentoo is finding out about other software like that imo.) |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |