Archives
Archives
| From: | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | openrc@g.o | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: status of OpenRC's public API | ||
| Date: | Sat, 21 Sep 2013 19:06:43 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130921190629.GA6459@linux1 | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] rfc: status of OpenRC's public API by William Hubbs |
||
| 1 | All, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | this is a followup to the original message that started this thread. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | A case has been made for librc, but not libeinfo. There could be reasons |
| 6 | to allow the librc functionality to stay around, but I'm not convinced |
| 7 | wrt libeinfo, especially since there are no consumers. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Does anyone see a reason we should keep the einfo/eerror/etc c functions |
| 10 | in a public API? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | William |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: status of OpenRC's public API | Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> |