| 1 |
On Monday 19 November 2001 15:25, you wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> about your CXXFLAGS patch, I'm not so sure I like it. It doesn't cause |
| 5 |
> any problems, but it's not according to the qmake specifications. During |
| 6 |
> compilation of qt -O3 and -O2 is both passed to gcc since the |
| 7 |
> optimization flags are put into another qmake flag. In fact to be really |
| 8 |
> correct, the CXXFLAGS should be parsed and each setting should be |
| 9 |
> assigned to the correct qmake flags (QMAKE_CC, QMAKE_CFLAGS, |
| 10 |
> QMAKE_CFLAGS_DEPS, QMAKE_CFLAGS_WARN_ON, QMAKE_CFLAGS_WARN_OFF, |
| 11 |
> QMAKE_CFLAGS_RELEASE, QMAKE_CFLAGS_DEBUG, QMAKE_CFLAGS_SHLIB and |
| 12 |
> QMAKE_CFLAGS_THREAD). I don't know however if it's worth the effort of |
| 13 |
> parsing the global CXXFLAGS. |
| 14 |
Hm. Sounds intimidating :-) I suppose I'll remove the patch for now. BTW I've |
| 15 |
put a similar patch into the qt-2.3.2 ebuild, what do you think of that? I |
| 16 |
don't much mind what I do with the qt-3.0 ebuild, because you're almost |
| 17 |
certainly the only one who's using it right now. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> Yes, the font problems are not due to your doing, but I would definately |
| 20 |
> add the -no-xft switch until trolltech resolves this matter. Using xft |
| 21 |
> everything really looks horrible and imho unusable. This might then |
| 22 |
> again be removed when a next release of qt3 fixes the problem. |
| 23 |
You're right; I'll do that. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> Also |
| 26 |
> don't forget to update the 45qt-x11-3.0.0 file to use |
| 27 |
> /usr/lib/qt-x11-free-3.0.0 instead of /usr/lib/qt-x11-3.0.0. |
| 28 |
I've upated the ebuild to install into /usr/lib/qt-x11-3.0.0, so that the |
| 29 |
45... file is correct. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Dan Armak |
| 34 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team |
| 35 |
Matan, Israel |
Archives