| 1 |
Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> What we propose is proper testing and keywording by anyone |
| 4 |
> around...not just team members. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Thanks for the info - inactive maintainers are obviously a problem. |
| 8 |
Maybe the proper approach is for a more "Free-for-all" system like you |
| 9 |
suggest, with arch teams focusing on more arch-specific aspects of |
| 10 |
gentoo (such as the 32-bit libs for amd64, etc), and with arch teams |
| 11 |
having a QA oversight role for their arch. Perhaps arch teams should |
| 12 |
publish clear (and reasonably simple) policies they would like to see |
| 13 |
followed with their archs, and then devs could feel free to follow them |
| 14 |
on their own initiative. Accountability would obviously matter, but we |
| 15 |
don't want to chop off hands for first offenses, either. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
The Gentoo dev community is fairly closed - it isn't like just anybody |
| 18 |
can go keywording packages left and right. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
However, we do need to make sure that QA is followed. |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives