| 1 |
On Samstag, 1. September 2007, Daniel Drake wrote: |
| 2 |
> I like the idea of adding this to CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Matthias Schwarzott wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Only problem I see: What to do with people having custom modifications |
| 6 |
> > inside the default rules-files? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I can't think of any cases where the user would have to do this (they |
| 9 |
> can make custom modifications in their own files). |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Could we modify the rules files installed by udev to include a comment |
| 12 |
> at the top warning that a default portage configuration will overwrite |
| 13 |
> any changes that the user makes? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
I have newer testing files locally, but as far as I remember udev-115 should |
| 16 |
contain this header on almost all rule files already. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
# do not edit this file, it will be overwritten on update |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Matthias |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Matthias Schwarzott (zzam) |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives