| 1 |
On 5/10/17 12:40 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 5/10/17 3:29 PM, David Seifert wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> So let's make sure we're on the same page -- here's my understanding. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> 1) For @system packages, we will have KEYWORDS="ppc" for the stable |
| 7 |
> versions and KEYWORDS="~ppc" for the rest. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
So is this only for PPC or PPC64 as well? |
| 10 |
Both are security supported arches, but if you are going this route they |
| 11 |
will be dropped to non-secured arches leaving: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
alpha, amd64, hppa, x86. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> 2) For non @system packages we will remove both ppc and ~ppc keywords. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> 3) If for some reason I need to add back a package to build/maintain |
| 19 |
> stage3/4, I will rekeyword myself, but other than that, we will *not* |
| 20 |
> balloon the keywords. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> 4) I will take on the responsibility of stabilizing ppc @system packages |
| 23 |
> if need be. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
So just to be clear, any developer can rekeyword a package to ~ppc? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
________________ |
| 31 |
Yury German |
| 32 |
Email: blueknight@g.o |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
GPG Fingerprint: 8858 89D6 C0C4 75C4 D0DD FA00 EEAF ED89 024C 043 |
Archives