| 1 |
Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 2 |
> There isn't one yet, but proctors@ or reporting on BugZilla will |
| 3 |
> probably work fine as soon as kingtaco and kloeri actually get the |
| 4 |
> initial proctors together. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
In all seriousness I propose asshole@g.o - I am not trying to start a |
| 7 |
bidding war here for names, so please don't flame me. The reason I propose |
| 8 |
is that anybody who uses gentoo knows what it means. Further, it's easy to |
| 9 |
remember; "Who was that asshole from gentoo- mail the .*!" It's not like |
| 10 |
the rest of the GNU community don't know about our situation and it shows |
| 11 |
we're taking it seriously, but not that seriously. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Nor is it much of a problem with anglophonic parents nowadays. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> "Only Gentoo developers may be nominated" |
| 16 |
> Thus your corner-case of a moderator that does nothing else wanting to |
| 17 |
> become a council member is not valid, because the moderator is not a |
| 18 |
> developer, if he were, he would be doing other things as well. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
As a user I would dearly love to see the forum mods in there. I guess you |
| 21 |
know that by now ;) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> See the 20060914 council meeting where we discussed conflicts of |
| 24 |
> interest and reached the conclusion that we should act professionally |
| 25 |
> (and impartially) if possible, and abstain from a matter if that was not |
| 26 |
> possible (example in the meeting was kloeri being the lead of devrel). |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
++ |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives