| 1 |
On Tuesday 11 May 2004 15:38, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tuesday 11 May 2004 20:55, Kevin wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > Thanks for your reply, Greg. Although what you say here may be |
| 5 |
> > true in some circumstances, I think you're wrong in this case. You |
| 6 |
> > may have stopped reading after the above paragraph, but in the rest |
| 7 |
> > of my post, I describe how a SuSE9 distro installed on this same |
| 8 |
> > hardware has no problems doing all of the things that failed in |
| 9 |
> > Gentoo. That's a pretty strong indication that there are no |
| 10 |
> > hardware problems, isn't it? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Do you also have errors when you run a vanilla kernel? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Yes, I mentioned that in my first post. Or by vanilla do you mean a |
| 15 |
kernel from kernel.org (as opposed to the Gentoo vanilla-sources |
| 16 |
kernel---that's the one I tried; isn't that identical to the kernel |
| 17 |
from kernel.org?) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> What if you |
| 20 |
> take the kernel from SUSE, |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I haven't tried installing Gentoo with my SuSE kernel running. Huh... |
| 23 |
what a concept. With all the modularity of those default distro |
| 24 |
kernels, would that even work? Maybe I'd need the kernel, the |
| 25 |
System.map, and the /lib/modules/`uname -r` directory? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> which compiler do you use? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
I built the standard compiler that you get with |
| 30 |
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" (stable). gcc and friends. Whatever is the |
| 31 |
standard stable ebuild is the one I built. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Thanks. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-Kevin |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives